Chicago Barn to Wire Breeders' Cup Handicapping Tournaments
Home | News | Bloggers | Forums | Resources | Links | Marketplace | Gallery | Contact Us | Search


October 25, 2014, 10:33:59 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: If you don't remember your password, email me.

New  registration procedures -- Some ISPs have been bouncing the verification emails.  Please email me to be activated or if you have any problems.  Click Contact Us above.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Midwest Wagering Scandal?????????????????/  (Read 6473 times)
burton
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14404




Ignore
« on: October 26, 2005, 05:07:43 PM »

Well last week this was a big topic.
I'm still waiting for some facts?Huh
Will there ever be any "facts' about this?
Report to moderator   Logged
the young one
Newbie
*
Posts: 44




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2005, 05:17:57 PM »

i dont really remember reading anything about this but wasnt it at indy downs involving the drivers?
Report to moderator   Logged
TC
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4183




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2005, 06:07:23 PM »

Since you're all clamoring for more, did I leave off with 7 people being seriously looked at for collusion and race fixing- 4 trainers and 3 drivers ?  They were asked to voluntarily submit copies of their cell phone records by a deadline date.  At least one of the trainers immediately cancelled his cell account in hopes of quashing further investigation.  More details will follow when the process moves along after Breeder's Cup day and the close of the meet.  TC
Report to moderator   Logged
burton
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14404




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2005, 06:48:29 PM »

Waiting for the "facts" with baited breath!
Report to moderator   Logged
Joe B
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 881




Ignore
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2005, 06:51:10 PM »

burton - didnt you know when a major scandel comes about...they wait until the meet closes and wait until after any major thoroughbred events before they address the scandel.....they do however tip off tc as to a few of the details....he so kindly shares them with us at his convenience...
Report to moderator   Logged
TC
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4183




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2005, 07:15:06 PM »

Joe, you're not one of the disgruntled people caught up in this, are you ?  We're lucky not to be in your shoes then.  Go back and work on your 4th hand erroneous stories and join another forum where you can hide like a wussy and spread lies all night and all day.  Sound good ?  TC
Report to moderator   Logged
TC
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4183




Ignore
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2005, 10:18:32 PM »

BTW, two owners from one driver/trainer combo already in the hot seat and their phone records are being requested for.  Soon, the story will be broken to the general public, I'll be taking crow orders then.  TC
Report to moderator   Logged
burton
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14404




Ignore
« Reply #7 on: October 27, 2005, 06:48:41 AM »

Still waiting for "FACTS"
Report to moderator   Logged
TC
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4183




Ignore
« Reply #8 on: October 27, 2005, 12:34:45 PM »

FACT 1 : Carpenter, who I believe has 0 to do with this scandal, appeared before the IRC already.  Fact 2 :  Todd Warren is next, as early as today or tomorrow.  When his sob story is complete, I'll give you more details and facts.  Mr. Warren's testimony should be quite interesting.  TC
Report to moderator   Logged
burton
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14404




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: October 27, 2005, 01:34:42 PM »

TC

Once again you lead us down the slippery slope of innuendo with zero facts.
Tell us about Warren.
Don't give the impression that he is in trouble with zero factual basis.
What is his sob story?
Report to moderator   Logged
TC
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4183




Ignore
« Reply #10 on: October 27, 2005, 01:46:19 PM »

TC

Once again you lead us down the slippery slope of innuendo with zero facts.
Tell us about Warren.
Don't give the impression that he is in trouble with zero factual basis.
What is his sob story?
*** YOU, blind man ! LEARN TO READ, the facts you asked for are right in front of you.  Don't address me ever again.  You'll be doing yourself a huge favor.  Now login as another persona, because that's what wusses do.  You don't know shit about racing anywhere.  You're a troll-mushroom.  Go haunt under another name, the one we're all more familiar with, or are you too scared ? TC
Report to moderator   Logged
burton
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14404




Ignore
« Reply #11 on: October 27, 2005, 02:08:29 PM »

I'm shaking!!!!
Report to moderator   Logged
TC
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4183




Ignore
« Reply #12 on: October 30, 2005, 01:21:55 AM »

Todd Warren gave the IRC zilch to go on and even gave them some lip when they pressed him on his cell phone usage.  One of his owners (Tanneyhill, I believe) picks up the tab for his cell but Warren gave the commission his wife's cells LUDS.  Very crafty indeed.  They still have over a half-dozen more interviews to conduct, so you'll know more soon.  This may boil down to a "request" not to show up for next year's meet, if the IRC can't prove race-fixing, but they do have at least one "player" on his cell at the SAM in the paddock, possibly betting on NOT his horse.  Stay tuned.  TC
Report to moderator   Logged
burton
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14404




Ignore
« Reply #13 on: October 30, 2005, 09:16:52 AM »

One call from one cell phone  another doesn't make a scandal?
Seriously, without recordings etc; what can be proven?
Please inform?
Report to moderator   Logged
TC
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4183




Ignore
« Reply #14 on: October 30, 2005, 09:30:25 AM »

One call from one cell phone  another doesn't make a scandal?
Seriously, without recordings etc; what can be proven?
Please inform?
That's the question.  It seems a commission not used to dealing with scandal of this sort may have "tipped their hand" in this case.  Warren gave them 'quasi niente', and their line of questioning was off fabric, IMO.  So what if the owner has the cells of Warren, his 2nd trainer, and grooms under his name.  They want the LUDs to establish calls made between parties that match the pari mutuel time log of wagers made on-track and in the overall system to try and prove guys were colluding to set up races.  The tapes of guys wagering in the paddock SAM mean little...but if they were to couple that with timed phone conversations and wagering logs, then the heat could be turned up.  The bottom line is unless someone panics,   I'd wager a nice voucher some "folks" won't be allowed to return to race in IN in '06 and the investigation will die on the vine.  Hard to figure that the "architects" of this activity outsmarted a bunch of Hoosier commissioners, but it wouldn't be the 1st time ...or the last.  TC   P.S. More appearances to follow... so Kate Smith is still spritzing her soprano with lemon - LOL.
Report to moderator   Logged
burton
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14404




Ignore
« Reply #15 on: October 30, 2005, 09:39:52 AM »

An awful lot to prove I would say.
Report to moderator   Logged
TC
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4183




Ignore
« Reply #16 on: October 30, 2005, 09:53:59 AM »

Can the IRC get a "Deep Throat" or are tapes of horsemen at the paddock SAM and LUDS enough to piece together a trail of deceit ?  That's the $64,000 question and where, IMO, this case stands.  TC
Report to moderator   Logged
burton
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14404




Ignore
« Reply #17 on: October 30, 2005, 10:01:40 AM »

Sounds like a long stretch?
Report to moderator   Logged
TC
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4183




Ignore
« Reply #18 on: October 30, 2005, 10:04:50 AM »

..longer than Balmoral's IMO -LOL. TC
Report to moderator   Logged
rozzibo
Newbie
*
Posts: 30




Ignore
« Reply #19 on: October 30, 2005, 03:36:12 PM »

when you say the SAM or LUD are you refering to the betting machines???   If so there is a live teller in the paddock not a machine.
Report to moderator   Logged
TC
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4183




Ignore
« Reply #20 on: October 30, 2005, 04:17:18 PM »

when you say the SAM or LUD are you refering to the betting machines???   If so there is a live teller in the paddock not a machine.
SAM is indeed the betting machine.  They use the different system than we do.  They use USA Tote (someone correct me if i'm wrong here).  THe LUDS refers to Local Usage Details, the record of all calls coming in and going out from a phone.  If horseman "A" were on tape at 8:15 at the SAM, talking to another horseman, and one or both had horses in the race coming up, then possibly bet against their own horses (pitching them), that would be illegal and really illegal if they profitted from it.  Do you see where the IRC is going with this.  IMO, they don't have much more than suspicions, but who knows who will say what when given the rubber hose/ bare bulb treatment ?  Did I witness any fishy drives, well in playing for value, I bypass chalks when playing supers (eliminating them from 1st and/or 2nd in wheels), so it rarely affected my movie.  I'll bet mom and pop $2 WIN bettor were steamed leaving Shelbyville headed back to the farm though.  TC
Report to moderator   Logged
burton
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14404




Ignore
« Reply #21 on: October 30, 2005, 04:44:12 PM »

If this did happen and I say "if", it would be extremely hard to prove if this is how they are piecing their story.
Report to moderator   Logged
Richard Breth
Guest

« Reply #22 on: October 30, 2005, 04:48:04 PM »

If this did happen and I say "if", it would be extremely hard to prove if this is how they are piecing their story.

How can you say that Burton read the strong evidence TC said "they do have at least one "player" on his cell at the SAM in the paddock, possibly betting on NOT his horse".

A player on his cell phone in the paddock. Making a call. Possibly betting. Possibly on NOT his horse. Open and shut case.
Report to moderator   Logged
burton
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14404




Ignore
« Reply #23 on: October 30, 2005, 04:52:34 PM »

I said "if".
Personally I doubt that any of this is true.
Just more racetrack gossip.
If it is remember OJ.
His victims blood was all over his house and he got off.
I know, bad analogy.
Report to moderator   Logged
TC
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4183




Ignore
« Reply #24 on: October 30, 2005, 05:06:36 PM »

Fellas, keep in mind the David Hawk story and possibly extrapolate it to this case.  Is he any less banned ?  His wagers were made through an online platform - not too bright.  I still am trying to figure out if the paddock camera angle can determine who bet what, how much doesn't matter.  In Hawk's case, the value was a winning $5 EX with longshots, but Tony Salvaro Jr. would know all the facts off the top of his head in that issue...paging Tony Jr.  TC
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.115 seconds with 16 queries.

Home
Upcoming events
Arlington Million
Horse slaughter in IL
Racing TV schedule
News Updates
Legislation

Galloping Out

Previous stories

Arlington
Balmoral
Hawthorne
Maywood
Chicago Sun-Times
Chicago Tribune
Blood-Horse
Daily Racing Form
Thoroughbred Times
Harness Link
Illinois Racing Board

 

2014

Arlington Million
Triple Crown
Illinois Derby

2013

Breeders' Cup
Hawthorne Gold Cup
Arlington Million
Triple Crown
Illinois Derby

2012

Breeders' Cup
Hawthorne Gold Cup
Arlington Million
Triple Crown
Illinois Derby

More ebay items

 

Home | News Updates | Bloggers | Forums | Search
Resources | Links | Marketplace | Gallery | Advertising | Contact Us

Copyright © 2000-2014 Chicago Barn to Wire. All rights reserved.
Privacy policy