LEDFORD SHOULD SUE DAN ***!

[MC]

  DAN *** TALKING ABOUT SUING PEOPLE FOR RUINING THEIR NAMES!? LEDFORD
SHOULD SUE HIM FOR ALL THE THINGS HE HAS SAID ABOUT HIM FOR OVER A YEAR
OR SO.  DAN HAS SAID SO MANY THINGS ABOUT HIM TO MAKE HIM LOOK BAD, BUT
I'M SURE LEDFORD KNOWS WHAT PEOPLE THINK ABOUT *** ALREADY.

[Dan Nance]

  DAN *** TALKING ABOUT SUING PEOPLE FOR RUINING THEIR NAMES!? LEDFORD
SHOULD SUE HIM FOR ALL THE THINGS HE HAS SAID ABOUT HIM FOR OVER A YEAR
OR SO.  DAN HAS SAID SO MANY THINGS ABOUT HIM TO MAKE HIM LOOK BAD, BUT
I'M SURE LEDFORD KNOWS WHAT PEOPLE THINK ABOUT *** ALREADY.

Anything I did say was the truth. Can't sue anyone for speaking the truth. I'll counter sue his ass for many things in the past he did and said to me.

   I'll turn over all my vet bills to the Feds for them to see his vet pre-raced my horses on race day. The dates are all there.

   

[MC]

  YOUR JUST A BIG MOUTH THAT IS ALL WINDDDDDDD!

[Dan Nance]

  YOUR JUST A BIG MOUTH THAT IS ALL WINDDDDDDD!

I might try and find out who you are and sue you too.

[ilovecopper]

  DAN *** TALKING ABOUT SUING PEOPLE FOR RUINING THEIR NAMES!? LEDFORD
SHOULD SUE HIM FOR ALL THE THINGS HE HAS SAID ABOUT HIM FOR OVER A YEAR
OR SO.  DAN HAS SAID SO MANY THINGS ABOUT HIM TO MAKE HIM LOOK BAD, BUT
I'M SURE LEDFORD KNOWS WHAT PEOPLE THINK ABOUT *** ALREADY.

   Ledford made himself look bad all by himself.

[Dan Nance]

   Ledford made himself look bad all by himself.

That's right! Nothing I ever said cost him thing in life. He had more owners then ever before until he got greedy and got HIMSELF busted. Anything I ever said about him was the truth.

    I should have sued him back in 99 for overcharging me. I think both of his vets Baliga and Cummings were pulling a fast one on me with the OUTRAGEOUS vet bills. I believe they were double billing me because I was 1800 miles away and couldn't keep close tabs on what they were actually doing.

    I should have sued all of them for giving my horse drugs on RACE DAY and putting me at risk for a positive on my horse that would have made me give back the purse money. My vet bills clearly showed that my horses were given drugs on the day they were to race which is against the rules.

   

[Dan Nance]

Here's what Tim Schmidt was quoted as saying in the Sun-Times below. What he is talking about is the TRAINERS RESPONSIBILITY rule.

    A RULE THAT RUCKER SEEMS TO GET OUT OF AFTER A SUSPENSION WAS HANDED DOWN TO HIM.

    Even though my suspension was reduced to 6 months I still had to serve time for not guarding my horse ( trainers responsibility rule ).

    Ruckers horses came up positive for gout and was given 6 months for trainers responsibility so why is he not serving time and why didn't he serve time when he was given 1 year for 10 caffeine positives?

    I want to sue the IRB for not carrying out the TRAINERS RESPONSIBILITY RULE IN A FAIR MANOR TO ALL HORSEMAN. The IRB cost me 7 owners back in 89 when I had to take 6 months off for something they admitted I didn't do. F*UCKEM ALL, I'M SUING IF I CAN.

[burton]

Dan,
Why don't you start you're own forum.
Obviously you have the time.
How many hundreds of times do we have to read your sad story about being suspended for a year and having it reduced to six months?
BORING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are as fresh as a Uriah Heep concert.

[mymymy]

At least when "they" jumped the fence and hit Ruckers horses "they" had enough sense to use gout medication, instead of elephant juice.