Chicago Barn to Wire Breeders' Cup Handicapping Tournaments
Home | News | Bloggers | Forums | Resources | Links | Marketplace | Gallery | Contact Us | Search


October 25, 2014, 01:24:03 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: If you don't remember your password, email me.

New  registration procedures -- Some ISPs have been bouncing the verification emails.  Please email me to be activated or if you have any problems.  Click Contact Us above.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Legality of Interstate Wagering Raised at Internet Hearing  (Read 804 times)
emp
Guest

« on: April 06, 2006, 06:42:41 AM »

Legality of Interstate Wagering Raised at Internet Hearing

by Tom LaMarra
Bloodhorse

As Congress continues to haggle over the scope and objective of the proposed Internet Gambling Prohibition Act, the racing industry again finds itself in disagreement with the Department of Justice over whether interstate simulcasts are legal under the federal law.
During an April 5 hearing before the House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security in Washington, D.C., questions often turned to the racing industry and whether it has a carve-out in the Internet Gambling Prohibition Act, which would target use of credit cards for Internet gambling but not expressly ban it. Lawmakers said they are somewhat confused by the legislation, in part because pari-mutuel wagering is governed by other laws.

Lawmakers cited figures that claim $14 billion -- half of it from residents of the United States -- was bet through the Internet last year, up from $8 billion the previous year. A few of them believe a commission should be formed to study Internet gambling before any bill is passed. The issue has been repeatedly addressed via proposed legislation since the mid-1990s.

Republican U.S. Rep. Bob Goodlatte of Virginia, chief sponsor of the legislation, said during the hearing the bill would eliminate Internet gambling but at the same time protect states' rights. The regulation of intrastate gambling is within the jurisdiction of each state, he said.

"While my legislation prohibits online, interstate gambling, it does not overturn previous acts of Congress that address gambling," Goodlatte said. "This is a strong anti-gambling bill that also protects the rights of states to determine what is--and is not--prohibited within their borders."

The pari-mutuel industry now derives about 85% of its revenue from interstate simulcasts -- the transmission of signals across state lines and to other countries -- but Goodlatte insisted there is no carve-out, or exemption, for racing in the legislation. The Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978 was amended in 2000 to allow for interstate account wagering, so a law already exists to protect pari-mutuel betting, racing industry officials have argued.

Democratic U.S. Rep. John Conyers Jr. of Michigan called dealing with horse racing a "conundrum" given the IHA, the Justice Department's position that interstate betting on racing is illegal, and the prohibition in the Goodlatte bill. Conyers pressed Goodlatte to comment on whether the IHA legalized Internet wagering on racing.

"I don't have an opinion on that piece of legislation," Goodlatte said. "We're not overturning that act or taking a position on what that act allows."

Bruce Ohr, chief of the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section in the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, said the department views existing criminal statutes as "prohibiting the interstate transmission of bets or wagers, including wagers on horse races." He said the department is "currently undertaking a civil investigation relating to a potential violation of law regarding this activity," but offered no details.

Ohr reiterated the department's position that the IHA didn't amend the Wire Act; racing industry officials and lobbyists have disagreed, and there has been no resolution. Ohr also said the Goodlatte bill permits intrastate wagering "without examining the actual routing of the transmission to determine if the wagering is 'intrastate' vs. 'interstate.' Under current law, the actual routing of the transmission is of great importance in deciding if the transmission is interstate commerce."

U.S. Rep. Robert "Bobby" Scott of Virginia, the ranking Democrat on the subcommittee, questioned the potential effectiveness of the Internet Gambling Prohibition Act. He said it wouldn't prohibit Internet gambling and suggested prosecution of individual gamblers may send a message. Scott likened it to prohibiting the sale of illegal drugs; the demand for drugs remains.

"A more effective regulatory approach must be developed," said Scott, who called for formation of a study commission to tackle the issue.

"Let's be real, my friends," Conyers said. "If we are to gain control of the online gambling industry, we must regulate it."

Democratic U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas had several questions to ask Goodlatte, including how the bill would impact online wagering on racing. She said she's concerned about "discriminatory aspects that may occur if we don't get it right, and I'm sensing we're not getting it right. Since we have a state of confusion, I'd be concerned about legislation that causes more confusion."

Jackson Lee said the "issue of gambling needs to be broader than this immediate hearing."

John Warren Kindt, a professor at the University of Illinois, told lawmakers of the socioeconomic problems associated with all forms of gambling. He said a strategic solution would be to ban Internet gambling and convert existing gambling facilities into educational and practical technology facilities.

Kindt included in his testimony a chart on the business economics of licensed organized gambling. The document called casinos, video gaming machines, and Internet betting the "crack cocaine of gambling," and horse and dog tracks, bingo, and lotteries the "marijuana of gambling."

Kindt claimed there is $3 in costs for every $1 in benefits when it comes to gambling and its impact on society.

Sam Vallandingham, vice president in the chief information office of the First State Bank of Barboursville, W.Va., said the Goodlatte bill would create problems for the banking industry by necessitating a massive overhaul of check-clearing and automated clearing house networks.

"As a representative of the (Independent Community Bankers of America), I urge you to reject proposals to use the banking system to restrict Internet gambling unless there is a reasonable chance the measures will be effective and will not add to the tremendous regulatory burden of our nation's financial institutions," Vallandingham told subcommittee members.

Goodlatte emphasized that gambling institutions, not banks, would be subject to criminal penalties under his bill.

http://news.bloodhorse.com/viewstory.asp?id=32899
Report to moderator   Logged
Irwin Fletcher
Full Member
***
Posts: 132




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: April 06, 2006, 09:24:44 AM »

These lawmakers and the racetracks are so far behind the curve on internet gaming it's not even funny.  Billions of dollars sent offshore every year.  Why not just legalize it across the board in this country and let the free-market economy take over? Can you imagine being able to go a Harrah's site and being able to play horses, poker or whatever you like?  All the tracks could have their own sites.  Let'em get into a bidding war over who will offer the best rebates.  And all that money will stay here to be taxed.  Seems like a no-brainer to me.
Report to moderator   Logged
Phlegm Wad
Full Member
***
Posts: 226




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: April 06, 2006, 10:10:18 AM »

These lawmakers and the racetracks are so far behind the curve on internet gaming it's not even funny.  Billions of dollars sent offshore every year.  Why not just legalize it across the board in this country and let the free-market economy take over? Can you imagine being able to go a Harrah's site and being able to play horses, poker or whatever you like?  All the tracks could have their own sites.  Let'em get into a bidding war over who will offer the best rebates.  And all that money will stay here to be taxed.  Seems like a no-brainer to me.

well, its a no brainer except for one thing - these politicians need something to ying yang about to make them feel important.  if we legalized it then the situation would solve itself and there would be nothing for them to do and they would have no power over it and they dont like that so they have incentive to keep the whole issue alive so they can pontificate about it
Report to moderator   Logged
Irwin Fletcher
Full Member
***
Posts: 132




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: April 06, 2006, 10:45:43 AM »

That's right
Report to moderator   Logged
off stride
Guest

« Reply #4 on: April 06, 2006, 11:38:28 AM »

Justice official says racing under scrutiny
By MATT HEGARTY
A top official in the Department of Justice said during a hearing in Washington on Wednesday that his unit is conducting a "civil investigation" of the horse racing industry's widespread practice of accepting bets over state lines.
Bruce Ohr, the chief of the U.S. Department of Justice's Organized Crime and Racketeering Section, told the Judiciary Subcommittee of the House of Representatives that existing laws prohibit interstate betting on horse races, according to a copy of his remarks that he supplied to the committee.

The hearing was held by the subcommittee to take testimony on a bill that would prohibit financial companies from allowing customers to deposit money with Internet gambling operations. The bill also contains exemptions for horse racing that would allow the industry to continue to conduct interstate wagering and allow for betting over the Internet by residents of states that allow the practice.

Officials for the Justice Department have argued over the past six years that interstate wagering on horse races is illegal, but the department has never acknowledged an investigation into the horse racing industry's practices. Ohr also said during his remarks that the Justice Department is concerned about the potential for fraud, money laundering, and the involvement of organized crime in Internet wagering, citing specifically a recent indictment of 17 individuals for operating an illegal gambling ring that bet $200 million on horse races over four years through five rebate shops.
 
Report to moderator   Logged
njhorseman
Guest

« Reply #5 on: April 06, 2006, 01:33:09 PM »

Justice official says racing under scrutiny
By MATT HEGARTY
A top official in the Department of Justice said during a hearing in Washington on Wednesday that his unit is conducting a "civil investigation" of the horse racing industry's widespread practice of accepting bets over state lines.
Bruce Ohr, the chief of the U.S. Department of Justice's Organized Crime and Racketeering Section, told the Judiciary Subcommittee of the House of Representatives that existing laws prohibit interstate betting on horse races, according to a copy of his remarks that he supplied to the committee.

The hearing was held by the subcommittee to take testimony on a bill that would prohibit financial companies from allowing customers to deposit money with Internet gambling operations. The bill also contains exemptions for horse racing that would allow the industry to continue to conduct interstate wagering and allow for betting over the Internet by residents of states that allow the practice.

Officials for the Justice Department have argued over the past six years that interstate wagering on horse races is illegal, but the department has never acknowledged an investigation into the horse racing industry's practices. Ohr also said during his remarks that the Justice Department is concerned about the potential for fraud, money laundering, and the involvement of organized crime in Internet wagering, citing specifically a recent indictment of 17 individuals for operating an illegal gambling ring that bet $200 million on horse races over four years through five rebate shops.
 


Another example of the Bush administration ignoring the nation's laws to promote its own right wing agenda. The fundamentalists think gambling is a sin, so the Justice Department, ever eager to get down on it's knees to "service" these tight-asses has spent six years investigating it. Six years...have they come up with something? Noooo...because the Interstate Horse Racing Act couldn't be any clearer. It permits Internet wagering on horse racing in any state that permits wagering on horse racing.

If these bozos in the Justice Department  try to pursue this any further they will be wasting even more of the taxpayer's money (so what else is new), and some federal judge is going to have a good laugh while ruling against them.

In think their next investigation will be into whether the Constitution prohibits Roman Catholics, **s, Muslims, atheists and agnostics from voting.
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.253 seconds with 17 queries.

Home
Upcoming events
Arlington Million
Horse slaughter in IL
Racing TV schedule
News Updates
Legislation

Galloping Out

Previous stories

Arlington
Balmoral
Hawthorne
Maywood
Chicago Sun-Times
Chicago Tribune
Blood-Horse
Daily Racing Form
Thoroughbred Times
Harness Link
Illinois Racing Board

 

2014

Arlington Million
Triple Crown
Illinois Derby

2013

Breeders' Cup
Hawthorne Gold Cup
Arlington Million
Triple Crown
Illinois Derby

2012

Breeders' Cup
Hawthorne Gold Cup
Arlington Million
Triple Crown
Illinois Derby

More ebay items

 

Home | News Updates | Bloggers | Forums | Search
Resources | Links | Marketplace | Gallery | Advertising | Contact Us

Copyright © 2000-2014 Chicago Barn to Wire. All rights reserved.
Privacy policy