Chicago Barn to Wire BRIS
Home | News | Bloggers | Forums | Resources | Links | Marketplace | Gallery | Contact Us | Search


August 29, 2014, 12:36:00 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: If you don't remember your password, email me.

New  registration procedures -- Some ISPs have been bouncing the verification emails.  Please email me to be activated or if you have any problems.  Click Contact Us above.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 209 210 [211] 212 213   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Another OT political thread  (Read 165625 times)
CLOCKERTERRY
Guest

« Reply #5250 on: September 17, 2009, 11:10:15 AM »

Dolfan,

It wasnt only Chris Matthews. CNN tried to pull the same stunt on live TV yesterday with the RNC's Michael Steele. They showed one sign and tried to portray it as rampant right-wing racism. Steele was smart enough to call CNN out on it.

There is nobody in the Lefty Media with the courage to say the truth ... that opposing the Obama Health Care Scheme Proposal is just the opposition to BAD LEGISLATION PROPOSAL.

It doesnt matter if Obama is black, white, green, yellow or poka-dotted. It is a bad proposal. Nothing Obama says he will offer is supported by facts and the money he says he will get for it can never materialize.

What Jimmy Carter is doing for them is taking that discussion off the table for a couple of days before Obama goes on every TV show ... except Fox News ... to once again push for his Scheme.

Get some cheese and crackers to go with that whine.

Quote
By the time Obama completes his latest TV take over, he will have spoken publicly on his Scheme 120 times. It is absolutely stunning that the President of the United States, with majorities of BOTH Houses of Congress to work with him, needs to speak publicly on his biggest agenda item 120 times and still has the majority of the people saying "NO"

Actually, the majority of the people are not saying no, and when it comes to speaking publicly many times to try and sell their program, my God how many times do we have to read about ACORN from you?

Quote
Now you want to talk about distractions, ;look at what Obama did today. He killes the missile shieldfor Europe ... on the 70th anniversary of the Soviet invasions.

Okay, refresh me here on what happened on September 17, 1939 ... oh, that's right, your hero Hitler has already attacked Poland in the west, and Hitler's non-aggression pact buddy Stalin makes a surprise attack from the east, ostensibly to protect Russian nationals.

Well, obviously, that's "invasions", plural, but it was the fault of Republican administrations before FDR who had failed to build a defense shield in Poland, going back untold centuries into the conflicts between Russia and Poland, and could have prevented it with their timely actions and expense of U.S. tax dollars.  screwy

Quote
But we arent supposed to worry about Obama

You are an idiot.
Report to moderator   Logged
Buffaloboy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5091




Ignore
« Reply #5251 on: September 17, 2009, 11:15:49 AM »

Europe believes that Barack Milhouse Obama, who has supported Communists and has them working for him, has surrendered to Communists and abandoned once American allies.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100010237/barack-obama-surrenders-to-russia-on-missile-defence/
Report to moderator   Logged

When will Barn To Wire finally do the right thing and ban Clockerterry & Edwarren for their continued lies, anti-American & anti-semetic statements and their general disrutpive stupidity? 

“The answer to a government that’s too big is to stop feeding its growth.” - President Ronald W. Reagan
Dolfan
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6067




Ignore
« Reply #5252 on: September 17, 2009, 11:19:46 AM »

From what I have read, he sometimes sides with the Palestinians over issues of human rights and land claims, and generally feels they have some legitimate gripes. As far as suicide bombings and condemnation, I cannot even understand what your sentence means. Perhaps you could find some links to stories demonstrating what you're talking about, so I can read them. And please, do provide that entire 1 to 1 correspondence - all bombings to all condemnations - that you're claiming, too.

You do realize there is a difference between anti-Semitism and degree of support for the State of Israel (which you conveniently try to muddy the waters by referring to as "the Jewish state"), right? Just because a person might not approve of the actions of the State of Israel does not mean he or she hates Jews. Whether or not, and to what degree, the U.S. should support the state of Israel, and whether or not Israel lives up to the U.S. ideals of observing human rights or even property rights, and what our policy should be in regard to both Israel and the Palestinians if they do not live up to our ideals and wishes, should be a legitimate topic of discussion in America, without people immediately hollering anti-Semitism. This is America we live in, and American money, and America's best foreign policy interests at stake. Maybe those align with Israel, and maybe they do not. It should be a legitimate field of discussion. And before you start hollering terrorism, recall that quite a number of the founders of the modern state of Israel were also dubbed terrorists for their activities of the 1940's.     

Like I said, the claims of Jimmy Carter's anti-Semitism seem to arise from him not toeing the line on unquestioning 100% support for the state of Israel.

It is not germane to this discussion, unless there was mention of either anti-Semitism or racism. Was there? Simply throwing tomatoes at Jimmy Carter does not impact on the truth or untruth of his statements about Obama and race in any way, shape, or form.

If people oppose Obama on racist grounds, then you claiming they don't is moronic. Some do; that's been admitted on this very forum. Not all criticism is based on race, and Jimmy Carter didn't say so, either.

ACORN is being blown far out of proportion to what it would be if it was any of the other many organizations or companies that get money from the U.S. government and engage in wrongdoing. That tells you it isn't just the money that matters. It isn't a "real story" at all, but a media creation of the right trying to do exactly the dishonest things we caught Buffalo Boob trying to do here earlier, claim it is "Obama's ACORN", and "Obama has involvement", and so on. It's only a story the right would LIKE to make a big deal out of.


ACORN is not blown out of proportion.  It is true that they were allocated $8 BILLION in taxpayer $.  They deserve NOTHING - zero!  They are as fraudulent as YOUR president & his left wing media.

Jimmy Carter & anti-semitism - this is easy.  I'll include articles from the Washington Post (lefty) who said he "trivializes the murder of Israelis", Alan Dershowitz (lefty) who said "Recent disclosures of Carter's extensive financial connections to Arab oil money, particularly from Saudi Arabia, had deeply shaken my belief in his integrity" & from the National Review, who said that Carter's words "are not careless errors, they flow from Carter’s pointed animus toward Israel and corresponding softness toward the Arabs".

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/19/AR2007011901541.html

http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/3267

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZjY4MTllMjY4OTA4OWViYTE5NGM3MGI3Nzg4ZGFkNmQ=

That's 3 to get you started but there are dozens more from liberals & conservatives.  It is fairly common knowledge that Carter is an anti-semite.  I will not supply you any more - you know how easy it is to be found.  

Just google "Jimmy Carter Anti-Semite" - you'll get plenty of choices!

The reason I brought up Kennedy & 1980 is because it is also fairly accepted that he was the worst President this country ever had to deal with & the Democrats & Kennedy obviously knew it too.  The day Carter dies, it will be a cause for celebration!

Report to moderator   Logged

We can produce more wealth, but we cannot produce more time.  When we give someone our time, we actually give a portion of our life that we will never get back.
NIATROSS
Guest

« Reply #5253 on: September 17, 2009, 11:27:58 AM »

Now ignored by 21 members the loon has set the standard for active members.Let me put in his own words so he can understand it while he peeks at everyone's posts.

He has been kicked to the curb by the active members who read the harness side of this forum yet he is too ignorant to see it.
Report to moderator   Logged
Dan Villeky
Guest

« Reply #5254 on: September 17, 2009, 11:39:44 AM »

Here's some democrat logic.
Ah yes, the "cash for clunker" program --a smashing success for the sheeple !

If you traded in a clunker worth $3500, you get $4500 off for an apparent "saving s" of $1000.
 
However, you have to pay taxes on the $4500 come April 15th (something that no auto dealer will tell you).  If you are in the 30% tax bracket, you will pay $1350 on that $4500.
 
So, rather than save $1000, you actually pay an extra $350 to the feds.  In addition, you traded in a car that was most likely paid for.  Now you have 4 or 5 years of payments on a car that you did not need, that was costing you less to run than the payments that you will now be making.
 
But wait, it gets even better:  you also got ripped off by the dealer.
For example, every dealer here in LA was selling the Ford Focus with all the goodies including A/C, auto transmission, power windows, etc for $12,500 the month before the "cash for clunkers" program started.
 
When "cash for clunkers" came along, they stopped discounting them  and instead sold them at the list price of $15,500.  So, you paid $3000 more than you would have the month before.  (Honda, Toyota , and Kia played the same list price game that Ford and Chevy did).
 
So lets do the final tally here:
 
You traded in a car worth:   $3500
You got a discount of:         $4500
                                              ---------
Net so far                         +$1000
But you have to pay:            $1350 in taxes on the $4500
                                               --------
Net so far:                          -$350
And you paid:                     $3000 more than the car was selling for the month before
                                            ---------- 
Net                                      -$3350
 
We could also add in the additional taxes (sales tax, state tax, etc.) on the extra $3000 that you paid for the car, along with the 5 years of interest on the car loan but lets just stop here.
 
So who actually made out on the deal?  The feds collected taxes on the car along with taxes on the $4500 they "gave" you.  The car dealers made an extra $3000 or more on every car they sold along with the kickbacks from the manufacturers and the loan companies.  The manufacturers got to dump lots of cars they could not give away the month before.  And the poor stupid consumer got saddled with even more debt that they cannot afford.
 
Our Chief CEO and his band of merry men convinced Joe consumer that he was getting $4500 in "free" money from the "government" when in fact Joe was giving away his $3500 car and paying an additional $3350 for the privilege.
 
Ah yes And you thought change was good,
but you did not realize the change was taken from your wallet

Report to moderator   Logged
Grinder
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2136




Ignore
« Reply #5255 on: September 17, 2009, 12:08:50 PM »

That is hilarious Dan V.  beer

Now lets also take a look Cash-4-Clunkers from a "Green-Enviro-economic" point of view.

A vehicle at 15 mpg and 12,000 miles per year
uses 800 gallons of gasoline annually.
 
A vehicle at 25 mpg and 12,000 miles per year uses 480
gallons a year.
 
So, the average clunker transaction will reduce US gasoline
consumption by 320 gallons per year.
 
They claim 700,000 vehicles sold – so that's 224 million
gallons / year.
 
That equates to a bit over 5 million barrels of oil.
 
5 million barrels of oil is about ¼ of ONE DAY'S US consumption.
 
5 million barrels of oil costs about $350 million
dollars at $70/bbl.
 
So, we all contributed to spending $3 billion (not including interest to auto loan lenders) to save $350
million.

Boy, we got that problem solved, gimme 5 brother!!   What's next, oh yeah healthcare, here we come  doh BSmeter
 
« Last Edit: September 17, 2009, 03:43:38 PM by Grinder » Report to moderator   Logged

The more you bet...the more you win
race track phil
Guest

« Reply #5256 on: September 17, 2009, 01:17:42 PM »

Just because a person might not approve of the actions of the State of Israel does not mean he or she hates Jews .

            Here's a TERRY quote above !

       Your right again and by your logic the same must be applied that its not a black president we don't support because of race its his policies and actions to our country .  The loons say it all race related though is that correct ?

                                             RTP

Report to moderator   Logged
race track phil
Guest

« Reply #5257 on: September 17, 2009, 01:34:37 PM »


       Your forgetting who's paying for that scam program Grinder for those clunkers that the minorities think they got a bargain buying . Just the tax payers that have to pay for a scam program that helped out the OBAMA auto industry . Great work Grinder on your figures .

      Dan even a dummy like myself figured that they altered the price of the car you could have bought prior to the clunkless program where you didn't get any deal you couldn't get before the program .

                                                RTP
Report to moderator   Logged
NIATROSS
Guest

« Reply #5258 on: September 17, 2009, 01:40:14 PM »

Last I heard 9% of the apps have been denied in the CASH FOR CLUNKERS PROGRAM.Wonder how amny of those are already on the road ?
Report to moderator   Logged
race track phil
Guest

« Reply #5259 on: September 17, 2009, 02:00:24 PM »


 
  Re: OT: Political thread
« Reply #10989 on: Today at 01:56:35 PM » Quote Modify 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: clockerterry on October 17, 2008, 02:40:08 PM
McCain callously using poor Joe again.

"John McCain is defending the headline-grabbing undecided Ohio voter from what he calls Obama campaign "attacks."

"Last weekend, Senator Obama showed up in Joe's driveway to ask for his vote, and Joe asked Senator Obama a tough question," McCain told voters in Miami Friday. "The response from Senator Obama and his campaign yesterday was to attack Joe. People are digging through his personal life and he has TV crews camped out in front of his house. He didn't ask for Senator Obama to come to his house."

Hey ***head McCain - What Joe really didn't ask was for YOU to bring him up on national TV and twist what was said to make some political points for your own selfish self!

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/

        One of Terry's great posts talking about someone twisting political points !!

        How familiar are these words now that Terry has done nothing but twist every post possible for his selfishness point of view .  Oh yeah and there's that HEAD remark about McCain comment !!  He can twist that too now and say it was dick or pot or big head .   Terry a scum of scum for that remark !

        New readers be aware of Terry nasty remarks about an American prisoner of WAR . That tells you what kind of person he is ( UnAmerican )

                                                RTP
 
Report to moderator   Logged
Dolfan
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6067




Ignore
« Reply #5260 on: September 17, 2009, 02:27:40 PM »

Here's some democrat logic.
Ah yes, the "cash for clunker" program --a smashing success for the sheeple !

If you traded in a clunker worth $3500, you get $4500 off for an apparent "saving s" of $1000.
 
However, you have to pay taxes on the $4500 come April 15th (something that no auto dealer will tell you).  If you are in the 30% tax bracket, you will pay $1350 on that $4500.
 
So, rather than save $1000, you actually pay an extra $350 to the feds.  In addition, you traded in a car that was most likely paid for.  Now you have 4 or 5 years of payments on a car that you did not need, that was costing you less to run than the payments that you will now be making.
 
But wait, it gets even better:  you also got ripped off by the dealer.
For example, every dealer here in LA was selling the Ford Focus with all the goodies including A/C, auto transmission, power windows, etc for $12,500 the month before the "cash for clunkers" program started.
 
When "cash for clunkers" came along, they stopped discounting them  and instead sold them at the list price of $15,500.  So, you paid $3000 more than you would have the month before.  (Honda, Toyota , and Kia played the same list price game that Ford and Chevy did).
 
So lets do the final tally here:
 
You traded in a car worth:   $3500
You got a discount of:         $4500
                                              ---------
Net so far                         +$1000
But you have to pay:            $1350 in taxes on the $4500
                                               --------
Net so far:                          -$350
And you paid:                     $3000 more than the car was selling for the month before
                                            ---------- 
Net                                      -$3350
 
We could also add in the additional taxes (sales tax, state tax, etc.) on the extra $3000 that you paid for the car, along with the 5 years of interest on the car loan but lets just stop here.
 
So who actually made out on the deal?  The feds collected taxes on the car along with taxes on the $4500 they "gave" you.  The car dealers made an extra $3000 or more on every car they sold along with the kickbacks from the manufacturers and the loan companies.  The manufacturers got to dump lots of cars they could not give away the month before.  And the poor stupid consumer got saddled with even more debt that they cannot afford.
 
Our Chief CEO and his band of merry men convinced Joe consumer that he was getting $4500 in "free" money from the "government" when in fact Joe was giving away his $3500 car and paying an additional $3350 for the privilege.
 
Ah yes And you thought change was good,
but you did not realize the change was taken from your wallet



There is one thing you left out.  Who got the shaft?  Since the dumb consumer took a $3500 car that had to be destroyed, the taxpayer got the shaft on that $3500.  More smarts from the party that brought you Jimmy Carter & Barack Obama, Barney Frank & Nancy Pelosi.
Report to moderator   Logged

We can produce more wealth, but we cannot produce more time.  When we give someone our time, we actually give a portion of our life that we will never get back.
bettor2belucky
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1782




Ignore
« Reply #5261 on: September 17, 2009, 03:26:27 PM »

When did Jimmy Carter become an anti-Semite?

No, he didn't, and in any case, your opinion on that has zero bearing on the truth or untruth of his statement about race and Obama.

Also zero bearing on the subject.

Please don't turn into a Buffalo Boob with the wholly unrelated and off topic ad hominem type arguments.
even the Dems are turning a deaf ear to our senile ex pres.. To defend the group Hamas over the State of Isreal is dispicable. The truth is  the policies of Obama (especially healthcare) are unpopular and has nothing to do with race. Not to be able to accept that fact and blame it on racism is downright moronic.
Where is the proof presented by Carter to back up his statement? NONE........ Carter never supported Isreal   
 From his book...........

Carter claims Israel has been the primary obstacle to peace, that Arab leaders have long sought peace while Israel preferred holding on to "Palestinian land" over peace, and that if only Israel would "[withdraw] to the 1967 border as specified in the U.N. Resolution 242...", there would be peace. 

Aside from his obviously questionable opinions, Carter is factually wrong when he asserts that U.N. Resolution 242 requires Israel to withdraw to the 1949 armistice line that was in place until 1967. He has repeated this serious falsehood in many interviews, such as on the November 28 PBS NewsHour:

"The demand is for them to give back all the land. The United Nations resolutions that apply, the agreements that have been made at Camp David under me and later at Oslo for which the Israeli leaders received the Nobel Peace Prizes, was [sic] based on Israel's withdrawal from occupied territories."

He mischaracterizes UN resolutions and apparently has forgotten what he himself signed as a witness to the 1978 Camp David Accords between Israel and Egypt, which states in Section A1c: "The negotiations [concerning the West Bank and Gaza] shall be based on all the provisions and principles of UN Security Council Resolution 242. The negotiations will resolve, among other matters, the location of the boundaries and the nature of the security arrangements."

To claim now that the very agreement he witnessed and signed specifies withdrawal to the 1949 armistice lines is outrageous. [While the 1979 Camp David document again mentions UN Resolution 242, it makes no further mention of the West Bank or Gaza Strip. It instead deals with Israeli-Egyptian relations, and includes a map of the Israel-Egypt International Boundary (Annex II). Tellingly, no maps demarcating any boundary between Israel and the Palestinians are appended to the Camp David documents, Resolution 242, the Oslo Accords, or the "road map".]

UN Resolution 242 does not require Israel to withdraw from all the land to the "1967 border", since there is no such border.  The "green line" is merely the 1949 armistice line and the drafters of 242 explicitly stated that this line was not a "secure border" -- which 242 calls for. 

 ........  why else would Carter denounce Isreal?

now back to racism.......where is it?
oh that's right MSDNC showing a white guy armed at a rally(while ignoring the black guy also carrying). or maybe you're blinded by that b actress Jeanne Garafalo who spews hate for all those who didn't drink the Kool ade....

don't turn into a Mo(r)on........
Report to moderator   Logged

"A government big enough to give you everything you want,is a government big enough to take away everything you have."  Thomas Jefferson

"I'm the President I can afford better." Barack Hussein Obama
bettor2belucky
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1782




Ignore
« Reply #5262 on: September 17, 2009, 03:35:52 PM »

Buffalo Boob crybabying it up again, boo hoo boo hoo, the media might get distracted from what we cretins think should be the top story, boo hoo boo hoo. They are so mean to us!

Get some cheese and crackers to go with that whine, Boob. Honestly.

It is a top story.......the White House , Congress and now their own CEO have spoken out about it......
Quit trying to hide the fact that another supporter that our president "brings to the table when he is elected" has blown up in his face..this administration on the last 9 months is the most disjointed , out of touch (since Carter,the other 1 term leader)  that even the Dems are questioning their agenda
Report to moderator   Logged

"A government big enough to give you everything you want,is a government big enough to take away everything you have."  Thomas Jefferson

"I'm the President I can afford better." Barack Hussein Obama
bettor2belucky
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1782




Ignore
« Reply #5263 on: September 17, 2009, 03:38:25 PM »

If people like Ed and I weren't here, there would be no "debate", it would be just you cretins sitting around having a daily circle jerk talking about how bad those darn Democrats are, oh yes I says to Madge, they're just sooooo sooooo bad, mmmm hmmmm!

In addition, you and honest anything are mutually exclusive.

there wouldn't be a need for this thread to last this long......thanx to you and your ilk....  kool ade good to the last drop, eh?
Report to moderator   Logged

"A government big enough to give you everything you want,is a government big enough to take away everything you have."  Thomas Jefferson

"I'm the President I can afford better." Barack Hussein Obama
bettor2belucky
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1782




Ignore
« Reply #5264 on: September 17, 2009, 03:41:46 PM »

But God Bless him in a way........for his policy let to the biggest liberal wipeout in history and Reagan not only mopped up Jimmys mess, but oversaw the bigggest boom of wealth and GDP growth of any President....even though he had no help from a lib senate and Tip O'Neil.

Too bad he did it all by running up a huge debt he didn't bother to pay for. Anyone can have a great time on a credit card ... for a while. And now it's come home to roost in the current downtiurn.


coming from a Obama supporter that is a riot....... doh screwy
Report to moderator   Logged

"A government big enough to give you everything you want,is a government big enough to take away everything you have."  Thomas Jefferson

"I'm the President I can afford better." Barack Hussein Obama
Grinder
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2136




Ignore
« Reply #5265 on: September 17, 2009, 03:49:03 PM »

But God Bless him in a way........for his policy let to the biggest liberal wipeout in history and Reagan not only mopped up Jimmys mess, but oversaw the bigggest boom of wealth and GDP growth of any President....even though he had no help from a lib senate and Tip O'Neil.

Too bad he did it all by running up a huge debt he didn't bother to pay for. Anyone can have a great time on a credit card ... for a while. And now it's come home to roost in the current downtiurn.


coming from a Obama supporter that is a riot....... doh screwy

 trophy Grin Grin
Report to moderator   Logged

The more you bet...the more you win
Dolfan
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6067




Ignore
« Reply #5266 on: September 17, 2009, 04:44:07 PM »

To Bettor2BeLucky,

Several outstanding posts.  There can no response to the truths that we & many others expose when it comes to the worst president ever (so far), Jimmy Carter. 
Report to moderator   Logged

We can produce more wealth, but we cannot produce more time.  When we give someone our time, we actually give a portion of our life that we will never get back.
Grinder
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2136




Ignore
« Reply #5267 on: September 17, 2009, 04:51:47 PM »

Imagine for a moment a 21.5% Prime interest rate!

That is the correct number, when Peanut head Carter left office! Criminal!

How did that help poor people own homes, start businesses, or buy durable goods?
Answer that one, Peanut lovers.

No wonder Anti-Semite Carter has a degree of personal guilt, that has reduced him to a fumbling
old fart who focused on habitat for humanity to try and repay a few hundred poor people after
F-**ing millions of others.
Report to moderator   Logged

The more you bet...the more you win
Grinder
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2136




Ignore
« Reply #5268 on: September 17, 2009, 04:52:37 PM »

As far as Reagan "running up a debt with no way to pay for it", nothing could be more ridiculous or untrue.  He (RR) realized that for this debt to be short-term and managable, he had to spur and encourage investment and growth of the US economy by shrinking government's huge appetite and bloated Carter-esque budgets. $40 billion in one slash, remember that? That was in the early 80's too, when indexed for inflation over these past 25-30 years, that number represents about $200 billion in todays dollars.  But here we have Mr. O ramping UP government spending by 787 billion, and NOT doing anything to spur the private sector or foreign investment. In fact, things like placing tariffs on Chinas tire imports have an opposite effect.

And Reaganomics, though it took a couple of years for the trickle down to begin (because so many liberal non-believers stuck to their ignorant belief that capital cannot possibly work its way thru the wealthy down to the middle class then to the poor) that many strangulation regulations were left in place, and the working class carried their weight up and beyond what many thought was possible.  New businesses, new taxpayers paying more into the system, and all a lower rates than we had seen.

So my point is that as long as the USA remains a growth country, and is viewed as economically more stable and showing reliable, positive growth, then it is just fine to borrow money from other nations. It also fosters good international trade habits.

But that is the fear of Obama's policymaking.  He is a fan of record budget deficits, but also a fan of adding weight every year to business in the form of higher taxes, enviro regulations, and employee care. Continued for much time, this will surely drive capital investment out of our country, and unions that Obama supports 100% will face an inescapable quandry when their employers fail under the weight of crushing government.

And you can bet every dime you have that the libs will blame Capitalism when that happens. Not themselves, but the economic system they consciously perverted and mocked.

Report to moderator   Logged

The more you bet...the more you win
Round Table
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2845

And then I saw her, coming out of the sun.




Ignore
« Reply #5269 on: September 17, 2009, 04:55:22 PM »

jews  dont  like the motherfucker 
Report to moderator   Logged

They ought to return to Tampa and fix the mistake they made.
Round Table
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2845

And then I saw her, coming out of the sun.




Ignore
« Reply #5270 on: September 17, 2009, 05:02:36 PM »

it seems to me reagan  was a very devisive president  who also  spent  a lot of money  for what he believed in without  much intention  of paying it back  except  by war  which came  later  when his vice president  became president   he was a very  sleepy fellow  that left  decsions to others  when you read books about him
Report to moderator   Logged

They ought to return to Tampa and fix the mistake they made.
Edwarren
Guest

« Reply #5271 on: September 17, 2009, 05:11:47 PM »

jews  dont  like the mother***er 

It seems that way.  He ran the prime up to defend the dollar.  HE didn't have the option of monetary expansion because the dollar had already been inflated to death because of Viet Nam.

US dollars were repatrioted from abroad and he left whoever would be the next President (him he hoped but it turned out to be Ron) with a strong dollar and room to cut taxes.
Report to moderator   Logged
Dan Villeky
Guest

« Reply #5272 on: September 17, 2009, 05:13:13 PM »

At long last the O'bummer administration has found a model on which they can construct their O'bummercare program.
The CANADIAN SINGLE PAYER SYSTEM is every lefty's dream..................dream on comrade!
This from the Associated Press, not exactly your everyday "cretin" source for news.
If this weren't so sad it would be hilarious.


Canadian Aboriginals receive body bags for flu
The Associated Press
WINNIPEG, Manitoba --
Health officials ordered an investigation Thursday into why the Canadian government sent body bags to an Aboriginal reserve in Manitoba after community leaders requested assistance to deal with an expected outbreak of swine flu.
The body bags were sent this week to a remote northern reserve that was hard hit by swine flu last spring. The bags were in a shipment of hand sanitizers and face masks.

Report to moderator   Logged
Edwarren
Guest

« Reply #5273 on: September 17, 2009, 06:01:21 PM »

There have been an unprecedented rash of suicides or homicides among Europeon bankers the past several months and now these same numbers of suicides or homicides are showing up among bankers on our shores.  Huh
Report to moderator   Logged
CLOCKERTERRY
Guest

« Reply #5274 on: September 17, 2009, 06:01:47 PM »

ACORN is not blown out of proportion.  It is true that they were allocated $8 BILLION in taxpayer $.  They deserve NOTHING - zero!  They are as fraudulent as YOUR president & his left wing media.

Peanuts compared to the money Bush and Cheney directed to ripoff artists like Halliburton.

Quote
Jimmy Carter & anti-semitism - this is easy.  I'll include articles from the Washington Post (lefty) who said he "trivializes the murder of Israelis", Alan Dershowitz (lefty) who said "Recent disclosures of Carter's extensive financial connections to Arab oil money, particularly from Saudi Arabia, had deeply shaken my belief in his integrity" & from the National Review, who said that Carter's words "are not careless errors, they flow from Carter’s pointed animus toward Israel and corresponding softness toward the Arabs".

Nothing there about anti-Semitism per se, just exactly what I said about not supporting the state of Israel. There IS a difference, right? You admit that? Or does one have to support Israel in every regard to avoid the label of anti-Semite?

Quote
That's 3 to get you started but there are dozens more from liberals & conservatives.  It is fairly common knowledge that Carter is an anti-semite.

I saw most of those, and read several, and I googled just the same you did. Nothing at all about Carter personally disliking Jews. What is common is the charge that he is an anti-Semite simply because he does not support Israel 100% unquestioningly.
 
Quote
The reason I brought up Kennedy & 1980 is because it is also fairly accepted that he was the worst
President this country ever had to deal with & the Democrats & Kennedy obviously knew it too.

Even if he was, which is not how he's rated by the historians, it has nothing to do with either anti-Semitism or racism. Just a cheap ad hominem attack by you.
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: 1 ... 209 210 [211] 212 213   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.134 seconds with 16 queries.

Home
Upcoming events
Arlington Million
Horse slaughter in IL
Racing TV schedule
News Updates
Legislation

Galloping Out

Previous stories

Arlington
Balmoral
Hawthorne
Maywood
Chicago Sun-Times
Chicago Tribune
Blood-Horse
Daily Racing Form
Thoroughbred Times
Harness Link
Illinois Racing Board

 

2014

Arlington Million
Triple Crown
Illinois Derby

2013

Breeders' Cup
Hawthorne Gold Cup
Arlington Million
Triple Crown
Illinois Derby

2012

Breeders' Cup
Hawthorne Gold Cup
Arlington Million
Triple Crown
Illinois Derby

More ebay items

 

Home | News Updates | Bloggers | Forums | Search
Resources | Links | Marketplace | Gallery | Advertising | Contact Us

Copyright © 2000-2014 Chicago Barn to Wire. All rights reserved.
Privacy policy