Chicago Barn to Wire
Home | News | Bloggers | Forums | Resources | Links | Marketplace | Gallery | Contact Us | Search

March 30, 2017, 05:54:25 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: If you don't remember your password, email me.

New  registration procedures -- Some ISPs have been bouncing the verification emails.  Please email me to be activated or if you have any problems.  Click Contact Us above.
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: "Win and You're In"-if you pay up!  (Read 1899 times)
Jr. Member
Posts: 88


« on: July 29, 2007, 05:24:01 AM »

Win and You're In*
By: Pat Cummings | July 28, 2007 8:22 PM
I'm not sure if everyone realized what "Win and You're In" really meant as the first weekend of the Breeders' Cup Challenge kicked off. Count me among the confused.

According to, if you win one of the BC Challenge races, you "automatically earn a spot in the corresponding Championship race without having to go through the selection process."

Yet, Mike Welsch of the Daily Racing Form indicated that since Ginger Punch was not Breeders' Cup nominated, she will still owe the supplemental fee of $180,000 to start in the race.

If that is the case, all this does is guarantee Ginger Punch a spot in the gate iIF her connections want to front some big cash as her breeders failed to spring for $500 as a yearling. If a full field of 14 are entered, and Ginger Punch is the 15th, and her Stronach Stable ownership pays... Win the Go For Wand, pay $180,000, and NOW you can run in the Breeders' Cup Distaff.

Trainer Gary Contessa, quoted in a Bloodhorse article earlier this week, said:

"It's a phenomenal concept...I would love to see it count for horses that weren't eligible. How about 'win and we'll pay for you to get in?' That would be nice," he said with a laugh.

Not only would that be nice, Gary, it would seem fair under the auspices of the concept. Only twice has a full field of 14 gone in the Distaff (1992, Paseana; 2006, Round Pond). Interestingly enough, Paseana's win in 1992 came by way of a supplemental nomination.

Horse racing has enough difficulty explaining it's features and nuances to newcomers. The Breeders' Cup Challenge was intended to add more of a team-sport automatic-bid feel to the big dance. Once again, racing does what it can to confuse the matter, and add a big old asterisk to Ginger Punch's win.

Good luck explaining to the newcomer that while Ginger Punch did win, she isn't in until her owner springs the $180k gate bill.
Report to moderator   Logged
Hero Member
Posts: 12323

My new motto: Remain Vertical!

« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2007, 03:26:28 PM »

Thanks. I was wondering about that when I read the story about it in the Form yesterday.

Steve Crist has a beef with the whole process, as well, but I think he feels it will be sorted out in next year's version.
Report to moderator   Logged

« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2007, 06:53:56 PM »

While talking about how Euro horses may get aced out by this gimmick, Alan Shuback had a good take on it too in yesterday's DRF.
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.064 seconds with 17 queries.

Upcoming events
Triple Crown
Illinois Derby
Horse slaughter in IL
Racing TV schedule
News Updates

Galloping Out

Previous stories

Chicago Sun-Times
Chicago Tribune
Daily Racing Form
Thoroughbred Times
Harness Link
Illinois Racing Board



Arlington Million
Triple Crown
Illinois Derby


Breeders' Cup
Arlington Million
Triple Crown
Illinois Derby


Breeders' Cup
Hawthorne Gold Cup
Arlington Million
Triple Crown
Illinois Derby

More ebay items


Home | News Updates | Bloggers | Forums | Search
Resources | Links | Marketplace | Gallery | Advertising | Contact Us

Copyright © 2000-2017 Chicago Barn to Wire. All rights reserved.
Privacy policy